The White way to go for the Creek?

Plans for an opening bridge and a working Creek basin, as proposed by the Faversham Creek Trust,  are “unrealistic”, says landowner/developer Michael White, according to the Faversham News (March 6).

A feasible proposal, he suggests, might be “a lock at Chambers Wharf, where funding and grants could be available and produce tremendous advantages to Faversham.” This might, he says, include flood defences for the whole town, a generator on the lock creating electricity, 24-hour access to water in the Creek, a wet habitat for birds, increased housing value and business opportunities. His business, Quayside Properties, would contribute to the funding, along with KCC, Shepherd Neame, BMM Weston and the Environment Agency. Furthermore, he says, “the time frame could be guaranteed, not like the bridge and basin that has been ongoing for years.”

Mr White also hasn’t given up on his plans to use Building No 1 at Standard Quay as a “destination” restaurant plus gallery and function room, despite having lost an appeal against refusal of planning permission. He says he hasn’t completely eliminated maritime use of the Quay: there are still moorings for 15 boats and barges, and four maritime businesses are working there (Faversham Ships, PSB, Masterweld and Faversham Joinery). He says there are 66 people working at the Quay, compared with 5 when he took over. He says he’s “restored and improved” every building that would otherwise have fallen into disrepair.

The paper invites comments on the relative merits of Mr White’s case compared with that of the Faversham Creek Trust.

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “The White way to go for the Creek?

  1. Claire B

    66 people working there compared to 5 when he took over?? Lies or truth?? I can hardly believe that this is true.

    Reply
  2. David Walker

    There is less certainty in this proposal than there is in the Creek Trust’s proposal..! Also there is no financial or any basis to build a commercial model on.
    As for the wine bar …. what was not understood about the current excess of wine bars in Faversham that was highlighted in very early proposals!
    I am glad there are so many people working in the creek. Many are part of the regeneration of the maritime essence of the site. That’s what we need to build on.
    No thankyou Mr White.
    David Walker

    Reply
  3. Debbie Lawther

    Have to admit, I’m not clear where Chambers Wharf is – adjacent to Quayside Property holdings?

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s